Special Education Rights
Federal and state laws
create specific rights for those eligible for special education services. A
copy of those rights must be given to parents only one time a year, except that
a copy must also be given to the parents upon initial referral or parental
request for evaluation, upon the first State complaint in a school year and
upon the first request for a due process hearing in a school year, when a
decision is made to the disciplinary action that constitutes a change of
placement, and upon request by a parent. The following is an explanation of
those rights. If you would like a further explanation of any of these
rights, you may contact the individual named above; your school principal; the
special education coordinator in your school system; or your superintendent of
schools. If you want another copy of your rights, have any questions, or
wish to arrange a conference, please contact the individual named above.
prior WRITTEN notice
Your education agency
must provide you with prior written notice within a reasonable time before it
proposes or refuses to initiate or change the identification, evaluation,
educational placement, or the provision of a free appropriate public education
(FAPE). The notice must include a full explanation of all of
the procedural safeguards available to you; a description of the action
proposed or refused by the education agency; an explanation of why your
education agency proposes or refuses to take the action; a description of other
options considered by the Individualized Education Program (IEP) Team and
the reasons why those options were rejected; a description of each evaluation
procedure, assessment, record, or report the education agency used as a basis
for the proposal or refusal; a description of any other factors which are
relevant to the education agency’s proposal or refusal; sources to contact to
obtain assistance in understanding the rights for special education; a
statement indicating that you have protection under the procedural safeguards;
and if the notice sent to you is not the first referral for evaluation, the way
by which you may obtain a copy of the procedural safeguards. The written
notice must be understandable to the general public and provided in your native
language or other mode of communication, unless it is clearly not feasible to
do so. If your native language or other mode of communication is not a
written language, your education agency must take steps to ensure that the
notice is translated orally or by other means to you in your native language or
other mode of communication; that you understand the content of the notice;
that you are provided sources to contact to obtain assistance in understanding
the information; and that there is written evidence that these requirements
have been met. If your education agency offers parents the choice of
receiving documents by e-mail, you may choose to receive prior written notice
by e-mail. Written notice must be provided to you when your child
graduates from high school with a regular diploma or exits because he or she
has exceeded the age of eligibility for a free appropriate public
education.
Parental consent
Your education agency
must obtain your informed written consent before conducting an initial
evaluation, before the initial provision of special education and related
services, or before obtaining additional data as part of a reevaluation.
Your consent to an initial evaluation must not be construed as consent for
initial provision of special education services and related services. The
education agency may, but is not required to use the State procedures for
mediation and due process hearings to determine whether initial evaluations or
reevaluations may be conducted when you have refused informed written
consent. If the hearing officer upholds your education agency, the
education agency may evaluate subject to your rights to appeal the decision and
the child must remain in the current educational placement awaiting the decision
of the appeal unless you and the education agency agree otherwise. If the
parent of a child refuses to give consent to the initial provision of special
education and related services, or fails to respond to a request for consent,
the education agency shall not provide special education and related services
to the child by utilizing due process hearing or mediation procedures. In
this instance, the education agency will not be considered to be in violation
of the requirement to make available a free appropriate public education to the
child and is not required to convene an IEP Team meeting or develop an IEP for
the child. The same applies if, subsequent to the initial provision of
special education and related services, the parent revokes consent in writing
and the public agency provides prior written notice before ceasing
services. If the parent revokes consent in writing after the initial
provision of services, the public agency is not required to amend the child’s
education record to remove any references to the child’s receipt of special
education and related services because of the revocation of consent.
Your education agency
must obtain your informed consent before it reevaluates your child, unless your
education agency can demonstrate that it took reasonable steps to obtain your
consent for your child's reevaluation and you did not respond. If you refuse to
consent to your child's reevaluation, the education agency may, but is not
required to, pursue your child's reevaluation by using the mediation and/or due
process hearing procedures to seek to override your refusal to consent to your
child's reevaluation. As with initial evaluations, your education agency does
not violate its obligations under Part B of the Individual With
Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) if it declines to pursue the
reevaluation in this manner. However, if after at least two attempts to
obtain your consent for reevaluation you have not responded, the education
agency may proceed with the reevaluation. Your consent is not required
before your education agency may review existing data as part of your child's
evaluation or a reevaluation, or give your child a test or other evaluation
that is given to all children unless, before that test or evaluation, consent
is required from all parents of all children. An education agency may not use a
parent's refusal to consent to one service or activity regarding initial
evaluation for special education services to deny the parent or child any other
service, benefit, or activity offered by the education agency for all children,
except as required by this part. If you are the parent of a child who is home
schooled or placed in a private school at your own expense, and you do not
provide your informed written consent for your child’s initial evaluation or
your child’s reevaluation, or you fail to respond to a request to provide your
informed written consent, the education agency shall not use its consent
override procedures and it is not required to consider your child as eligible
to receive equitable services. Your informed written consent or the
informed written consent of an eligible child who has reached the age of
majority (Age 19), must be obtained prior to an IEP Team meeting before
representatives of participating agencies who may be responsible for providing
or paying for transition services may be invited to the IEP Team meeting.
TRANSFER OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AT AGE OF MAJORITY
When a child with a disability reaches the age of majority under
State law (Age 19) that applies to all children (except for a child with
a disability who has been determined to be incompetent under State law) the
education agency must provide any notice required by this part to both the
child and the parents; and all rights accorded to parents under Part B of the
IDEA transfer to the child; all rights accorded to parents under Part B of the
IDEA transfer to children who are incarcerated in an adult or juvenile, State
or local correctional institution; and whenever the rights have been
transferred, the agency must notify the child and the parents of the transfer
of rights.
INDEPENDENT EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION
You have the right to an
independent educational evaluation at public expense if you disagree with an
evaluation obtained by your education agency. However, your education
agency may request a due process hearing to show that its evaluation is
appropriate. If the final decision is that the evaluation is appropriate,
you still have the right to an independent educational evaluation, but not at
public expense. If you obtain an independent educational evaluation at
private expense, the results of the evaluation must be considered by your
education agency (if it meets agency criteria) in any decision made with
respect to the provision of a free appropriate public education and may be
presented as evidence at a due process hearing. If a due process hearing
officer requests an independent educational evaluation as part of a hearing,
the cost of the evaluation will not be at your expense. Each education
agency shall provide you, on request, information about where an independent
educational evaluation may be obtained and the criteria for the independent
educational evaluation. Whenever an independent educational evaluation is
at public expense, the standards under which the evaluation is obtained,
including the location of the evaluation and the qualifications of the
examiner, must be the same as the standards that the education agency uses when
it conducts an evaluation. A parent is entitled to only one independent
educational evaluation at public expense each time the public agency conducts
an evaluation with which the parent disagrees.
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN STATE
COMPLAINT AND DUE PROCESS HEARING PROCEDURES
The regulations for Part
B of IDEA set forth separate procedures for State complaints and for due
process hearings. As explained below, any individual or organization may
file a State complaint alleging a violation of any Part B requirement by an
education agency, the SDE, or any other public agency. Only you or an
education agency may file a due process hearing request on any matter relating
to a proposal or a refusal to initiate or change the identification,
evaluation, or educational placement of a child with a disability, or the
provision of a free appropriate public education to the child. While
staff of the SDE generally must resolve a State complaint within a 60 calendar
day timeline, unless the timeline is properly extended, an impartial due
process hearing officer must hear a due process hearing (if not resolved
through a resolution meeting or through mediation) and issue a written decision
within 45 calendar days after the end of the resolution period, unless the
hearing officer grants a specific extension of the timeline at your request or
the education agency’s request.
STATE COMPLAINT
PROCEDURES
Any individual or
organization has a right to file a signed written complaint alleging that a
school system has violated the IDEA or 34 CFR Part 300 and the facts on which
the statement is based; to present allegation(s) that occurred not more than
one year prior to the date that the complaint is received; to submit additional
information either orally or in writing about the allegations in the complaint;
to a written decision within 60 calendar days that addresses each allegation in
the complaint and contains findings of fact and conclusions and the reasons for
the final decision; to an extension of the time limit only if exceptional
circumstances exist with respect to a particular complaint; and to procedures
for effective implementation of the final decision, if needed, including
technical assistance activities, negotiations, and corrective actions to
achieve compliance. It is permissible for the timeline to be extended if
the parent and the education agency agree to extend the timeline in order to
participate in mediation to resolve the state complaint. The education agency
will respond to the complaint allegations, at the discretion of the education
agency, a proposal to resolve the complaint. An independent onsite
investigation will occur as determined appropriate by the SDE, Special
Education Services.
If requested, the SDE,
Special Education Services, will provide you with a sample form for filing a
State complaint.
You are not required to
use the sample form, however your complaint must include: (1) A statement
that a public agency has violated a requirement of Part B of the IDEA or of
this part; (2) The facts on which the statement is based; (3)
The signature and contact information for the complainant; and (4) If alleging
violations with respect to a specific child: (a) The name and address of
the residence of the child; (b) The name of the school the child is attending;
(c) In the case of a homeless child or youth (within the meaning of section
725(2) of the McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a(2)),
available contact information for the child, and the name of the school the
child is attending; (d) A description of the nature of the problem of the
child, including facts relating to the problem; and (e) A proposed resolution
of the problem to the extent known and available to the party at the time the
complaint is filed.
A party filing a complaint must send it to the SES section of
the SDE. The party filing the complaint must forward a copy of the
complaint to the LEA or public agency serving the child at the same time the
party files the complaint with the SDE. If after reviewing
the complaint, the SES determines that it includes all of the required
information and is signed, the 60-day timeline begins on the workday that the
SES received the complaint. A signature requirement is the same that a
person would use for any other legal document such as a bank check or signing a
contract. Exceptions may be made for persons without the ability to sign
their name.
If a written complaint is received that is also the subject of a
due process hearing, or contains multiple issues of which one or more are part
of that hearing, the State must set aside any part of the complaint that is
being addressed in the due process hearing until the conclusion of the hearing.
However, any issue in the complaint that is not a part of the due process
action must be resolved using the time limit and procedures required. If
an issue raised in a complaint filed under this section has previously been
decided in a due process hearing involving the same parties the due process
hearing decision is binding on that issue; and the SEA must inform the
complainant to that effect. A complaint alleging a public agency's
failure to implement a due process hearing decision must be resolved by the
SEA.
State MEDIATION
Procedures
You have the right to
participate in mediation to resolve disagreements under IDEA with an education
agency, whether or not you have requested a due process hearing or have filed a
State complaint. The voluntary mediation will be scheduled by the SDE at no
cost to you. A qualified impartial mediator trained in effective mediation
techniques and selected by rotation will be provided and each mediation session
will be scheduled in a timely manner and held in a location convenient to the
parties in the dispute. The SDE must have a list of qualified mediators and the
mediators must be knowledgeable of the laws and regulations relating to special
education and related services. The mediators may not be employees of the SDE
or the education agency involved in the education or care of your child and
must not have a personal or professional conflict of interest. You may
participate without denial or delay of any other rights. If an agreement
is reached, a legally binding written agreement that is signed by the parent
and a representative of the education agency that has the authority to bind the
education agency will state the resolution. All parties sign a confidentiality
pledge prior to the beginning of the mediation process to assure
confidentiality of mediation discussions and assurance that discussions may not
be used as evidence in any later due process hearings or civil
proceedings. The mediation agreement is enforceable in any State court of
competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States. The
education agency may develop procedures that offer an opportunity to meet with
a disinterested party at a time and location convenient to you if you have
chosen not to participate in mediation. The benefits of mediation will be
explained by the disinterested party to encourage the use of mediation.
due process hearing
Procedures
You may request a due
process hearing regarding the education agency’s proposal or refusal to
initiate or change the identification, evaluation, educational placement, or the
provision of a free appropriate public education. If you request a
hearing, you or your attorney must provide a copy of the written request (that
must be kept confidential) to the other party and to the SDE. If requested, the
SDE, Special Education Services section, will provide you with a sample form
for requesting a due process hearing.
You are not required to
use the sample form, however your request must include: (1) The name of
the child; (2) The address of the residence of the child or available contact
information in the case of a homeless child; (3) The name of the school the
child is attending; (4) A description of the nature of the problem
including facts relating to the problem that occurred within two years of the
date the parent or the education agency knew or should have known about the
alleged action that is the basis for the hearing request; and (5) A proposed
resolution of the problem to the extent known and available to you at the time
you requested the hearing. The timeline shall not apply to a parent if
the parent was prevented from requesting the hearing due to specific
misrepresentations by the education agency that it had resolved the problem
forming the basis of the written request; or the education agency’s withholding
of information from the parent that was required under this part to be provided
to the parent. You or the education agency may not have a due process
hearing until you (or your attorney), or the education agency, files a due
process hearing request that includes all of the information listed above.
If after receiving the due process hearing request, and SES
determines that it includes all of the required information and is signed, the
due process hearing will be initiated and the timeline begins on the workday received.
A signature requirement is the same that a person would use for any other legal
document such as a bank check or signing a contract. Exceptions may be
made for persons without the ability to sign their name.
The party requesting the
hearing shall not be allowed to raise issues at the hearing that were not
raised in the written request for a hearing unless the other party agrees
otherwise.
The education agency must
inform you of any free or low-cost legal and other relevant services available
in the area if you request the information or if you or the education agency
requests a hearing.
In order for a due
process hearing to go forward, the request must be considered sufficient.
The due process request will be considered sufficient (to have met the content
requirements above) unless the party receiving the due process complaint (you
or the education agency) notifies the hearing officer and the other party in
writing, within 15 calendar days of receiving the complaint, that the receiving
party believes that the due process complaint does not meet the requirements
listed above. Within five calendar days of receiving the notification that the
receiving party (you or the education agency) considers a due process request
insufficient, the hearing officer must decide if the due process request meets
the content requirements, and notify you and the education agency in writing
immediately.
You or the education
agency may make changes to the hearing request only if the other party approves
of the changes in writing and is given the chance to resolve the due process
request through a resolution meeting, or no later than five days before the due
process hearing begins, the hearing officer grants permission for the changes.
If the complaining party makes changes to the due process request, the
timelines for the resolution meeting and the time period for resolution start
again on the date the amended request is filed.
Within 10 calendar days
of receiving a copy of your request for a hearing, the education agency will
provide you written notice addressing the concerns of the request for hearing,
if it has not previously done so. The response must include an explanation of
why the education agency proposed or refused to take the action raised in the
due process request, a description of other options that the child's IEP Team
considered and the reasons why those options were rejected, a description of
each evaluation procedure, assessment, record, or report the education agency
used as the basis for the proposed or refused action, and a description of the
other factors that are relevant to the educational agency’s proposed or refused
action. However, providing this information does not prevent the education
agency from asserting that the due process request was insufficient.
If the education agency
files the due process hearing request, you must, within 10 calendar days of
receiving the request, send the education agency a response that specifically
addresses the issues in the complaint.
Prior to the opportunity
for a hearing, the education agency, within 15 calendar days of receiving the
parents’ request for a hearing, will convene a meeting with the parents and the
relevant member or members of the IEP Team (as determined by the education
agency and the parent), including a member who has decision-making authority on
behalf of the education agency, and who have specific knowledge of the facts
identified in the written request for a hearing. The education agency may not
include an attorney of the education agency if an attorney does not accompany
the parent. The purpose of the meeting is for the parents of the child to
discuss their hearing issues and the facts that form the basis of the hearing
request. The education agency is then provided the opportunity to resolve the
hearing issues unless the parents and the education agency agree in writing to
waive such meeting, or agree to use the mediation process. If a
resolution is reached at the resolution meeting or mediation, the parties shall
execute a legally binding agreement that is signed by both the parent and a
representative of the education agency who has the authority to bind the
education agency. This agreement is enforceable in any State court of competent
jurisdiction or in a district court of the United States. If the parties
execute such an agreement, a party may void such agreement within three
business days of the agreement’s execution. If the education agency
has not resolved the hearing issues to the satisfaction of the parents within
30 days of the receipt of the written request for a hearing, the hearing may
occur and all the applicable timelines for a hearing will commence. A
final hearing decision will be reached within 45 calendar days after the
hearing timeline commences (i.e., after the 30-day timeline to resolve the
issues has expired) unless the hearing officer grants a specific extension at
the request of either party. A copy of the decision is mailed to each of
the parties.
Except where you and the
education agency have both agreed to waive the resolution process or to use
mediation, failure of the parent to participate in the resolution meeting will
delay the timelines for the resolution process and the due process hearing until
the parent’s agree to participate in a meeting. If after making reasonable
efforts and documenting such efforts, the education agency is not able to
obtain the parent’s participation in the resolution meeting, the education
agency may, at the end of the 30 calendar day resolution period, request that a
hearing officer dismiss your due process request. Documentation of such
efforts must include a record of the education agency’s attempts to arrange a
mutually agreed upon time and place, such as detailed records of telephone
calls made or attempted and the results of those calls; copies of
correspondence sent and any responses received; and detailed records of visits
made to the home or place of employment and the results of those visits. If the
education agency fails to hold the resolution meeting within 15 calendar days
of receiving notice of the parent’s due process request or fails to participate
in the resolution meeting, the parent may ask a hearing officer to order that
the 45 calendar day due process hearing timeline begin.
If the parent and the
education agency agree in writing to waive the resolution meeting, then the 45
calendar day timeline for the due process hearing starts the next day.
After the start of mediation or the resolution meeting and before the end of
the 30 calendar day resolution period, if the parent and the education agency
agree in writing that no agreement is possible, then the 45 calendar day
timeline for the due process hearing starts the next day. If the parent and the
education agency agree to use the mediation process, at the end of the 30
calendar day resolution period, both parties can agree in writing to continue
the mediation until an agreement is reached. However, if either party withdraws
from the mediation process, then the 45 calendar day timeline for the due
process hearing starts the next day.
At a minimum a hearing
officer must not be an employee of the state education agency or the local
education agency that is involved in the education or care of the child, or any
person having a personal or professional interest that would conflict with his
or her objectivity in the hearing. A person who otherwise qualifies to
conduct a hearing is not an employee of the education agency solely because he
or she is paid by the education agency to serve as a hearing officer. He
or she must possess the knowledge and the ability to: understand the provisions
of the IDEA, Federal and State regulations pertaining to the IDEA, and legal
interpretations by Federal and State courts; conduct hearings in accordance
with appropriate, standard legal practice; and render and write decisions in
accordance with appropriate, standard legal practice.
Each education agency
shall keep a list of the persons who serve as due process hearing officers.
The list must include a statement of the qualifications of each of those
persons.
Any party to a hearing
has the right to be accompanied and advised by counsel and by individuals with
special knowledge or training with respect to the problems of children with
disabilities except state law prohibits non-attorney representation; present
evidence and confront, cross-examine, and compel the attendance of witnesses;
prohibit the introduction of any evidence at the hearing that has not been
disclosed to that party at least five business days before the hearing; obtain
a written or electronic verbatim record of the hearing; and obtain written, or
at the option of the parents, electronic findings of fact and decisions at no
cost. In addition, you have the right to have the child present; open the
hearing to the public; and have the hearing conducted at a time and place,
which is reasonably convenient to you at no cost. At least five business
days prior to the hearing, each party shall disclose to all other parties all
evaluations completed by that date and the recommendations based on the
offering party’s evaluation that the party intends to use at the hearing.
A hearing officer may prevent any party that fails to comply with this
requirement from introducing the relevant evaluations or recommendations at the
hearing without the consent of the other party.
civil action
The decision of the
hearing officer is final except that any party aggrieved by the findings and
decision made in a due process hearing has the right to bring a civil action in
any state court of competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United
States without regard to the amount in controversy. An aggrieved party
must file a notice of intent to file a civil action with all parties to the
hearing within 30 calendar days upon receipt of the decision of the hearing
officer. A civil action in a court of competent jurisdiction must be
filed within 30 days of the filing of the notice of intent to file a civil
action.
A hearing officer’s
decision on whether the child received a free appropriate public education must
be based on substantive grounds. In matters alleging a procedural
violation, a hearing officer may find that the child did not receive free
appropriate public education only if the procedural inadequacies interfered
with the child’s right to free appropriate public education, significantly
interfered with the parent’s opportunity to participate in the decision-making
process regarding the provision of free appropriate public education to the
child, or caused a deprivation of an educational benefit.
None of the provisions
described above can be interpreted to prevent a hearing officer from ordering
an education agency to comply with the procedural safeguards requirements.
Nothing in this part
should be interpreted to prevent the parent from submitting a separate due
process hearing request on an issue separate from a due process request already
filed.
child’s status during
proceedings
During the pendency of
the resolution period, a due process hearing, or judicial proceeding, unless
you and the state or your education agency agree otherwise, the child must
remain in his or her current educational placement. If the hearing officer
agrees with the parent that a change of placement is appropriate, that
placement must be treated as an agreement between the State and the parent.
If the hearing involves
an application for initial admission to public school, the child, with parental
consent, must be placed in the public school until the completion of all the
proceedings. If the hearing involves an application for initial services
under Part B from a child transitioning from Part C to Part B and is no longer
eligible for Part C services because the child turned three, the education
agency is not required to provide the Part C services that the child was
receiving. If the child is found eligible for special education and
related services under Part B, and the parent consents to the initial provision
of special education and related services, then the educational agency must
provide those special education and related services that are not in dispute.
However, if a parent requests a due process hearing regarding a disciplinary
action, placement remains in the alternative education setting pending the
decision of the hearing officer or until the expiration of the time period
unless the parent and the education agency agree otherwise. A request for
expedited hearing for discipline matters must occur within 20 school days of
the date the hearing is requested and the hearing officer must make a
determination within 10 school days after the hearing.
State Enforcement
Mechanisms. For enforcement of a written agreement reached as a
result of mediation or a resolution meeting, the State Education Agency (SEA)
will allow other state enforcement mechanisms to seek enforcement of that
agreement, provided that use of those mechanisms is not mandatory and does not
delay or deny a party the right to seek enforcement of the written agreement in
a State court of competent jurisdiction or in a district court of the United
States.
award of attorneys’ fees
In any action or
proceeding brought under Part B of the IDEA, the court may award reasonable
attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party who is the parent of a child with a
disability; or to a prevailing party who is a state or local education agency
against the attorney of a parent who files a hearing request or court case that
is frivolous, unreasonable, or without foundation, or against the attorney of a
parent who continued to litigate after the litigation clearly became frivolous,
unreasonable, or without foundation; or to a prevailing State or local
education agency against the attorney of a parent, or against the parent if the
parent’s request or subsequent cause of action was presented for any improper
purpose, such as to harass, to cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase
the cost of litigation. The fee shall be based on rates prevailing
in the community in which the action or proceeding arose for the kind and
quality of services furnished.
Attorneys’ fees may not be awarded and related costs may not be
reimbursed for services performed subsequent to the time of a written offer of
settlement to the parent if the offer is made to the parent 10 calendar days
prior to the hearing; the offer is not accepted by the parent within 10
calendar days; and hearing officer or court finds that the hearing decision
obtained by the parents was not more favorable to the parents than the offer of
settlement. Also, fees may not be awarded for attendance at any IEP Team
meeting unless the meeting is convened as a result of thehearing officer’s decision
or court action. However, an award of attorneys' fees and related costs
may be made to a parent who is the prevailing party and who was substantially
justified in rejecting the settlement offer. A resolution meeting is not
considered an administrative hearing or court action for purposes of the
attorney’s fees provisions.
The amount of attorneys’
fees awarded may be reduced if the parent or parent’s attorney, during the
course of the action or proceeding, unreasonably protracted the final
resolution of the controversy; the amount of the attorneys’ fees otherwise
authorized to be awarded unreasonably exceeds the hourly prevailing rate in the
community for similar services by attorneys of reasonably comparable skill,
reputation, and experience; the time spent and legal services furnished were
excessive considering the nature of the action or proceedings; or the attorney
representing the parent did not provide to the education agency the appropriate
information in the due process hearingrequest. The preceding items will
not apply in any action or proceeding if the court finds that the state or
local education agency unreasonably protracted the final resolution of the
action or proceeding or there was a violation of these rules.
access to records
Your education agency
must permit you to inspect and review all education records of your child, that
are collected, maintained, or used by the participating agency under Part B of
the IDEA. The participating agency must comply with a request without
unnecessary delay and before any meeting regarding an individualized education
program, or hearing relating to the identification, evaluation, educational
placement, or provision of a free appropriate public education, or resolution
session is conducted and in no case more than 45 days after the request has
been made. Your right to inspect and review records includes your right
to a response from the participating agency to reasonable requests for
explanations and interpretations of the records; to have your representative
inspect and review the records; and to request that the participating agency
provide copies of the records containing the information if failure to provide
those copies would effectively prevent you from exercising your right to
inspect and review the records. The participating agency may not charge a
fee to search for or to retrieve information under this part, but may charge a
fee for copies of records which are made for you under this part if the fee
does not effectively prevent you from exercising your right to inspect and
review those records. The agency may presume that you have authority to
inspect and review records unless the agency has been advised that you do not
have the authority under applicable State law governing such matters as guardianship,
or separation, and divorce. If any education record includes information
on more than one child, you may review only the information relating to your
situation or be informed of that specific information. The participating
agency must provide you, on request, a list of the types and locations of
education records collected, maintained, or used by the participating
agency. The participating agency must keep a record of parties obtaining
access to education records collected, maintained, or used (except access by
parents and authorized employees of the participating agency), including the
name of the party, the date access was given, and the purpose for which the
party is authorized to review the records.
RIGHTS FOR CHILDREN
Education agencies must
afford to the child, rights of privacy similar to those afforded to parents
regarding records taking into consideration the age of the child and type and
severity of the disability. Although the rights of parents under the IDEA
transfer to the child at the age of majority (Age 19), the rights of parents
regarding educational records under the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act (FERPA) at 34 CFR Part 99 transfer to the child at age 18.
CONSENT FOR DISCLOSURE OF
PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION
Your consent must be
obtained before personally identifiable information is disclosed to parties
other than officials of participating agencies. Except under the
circumstances below, your consent is not required before personally
identifiable information is released to officials of participating agencies for
purposes of meeting a requirement of Part B of the IDEA.
Your consent or the
consent of an eligible child who has reached the age of 19 must be obtained
before personally identifiable information is released to officials of
participating agencies responsible for providing or paying for transition
services.
Also, if your child is
in, or is going to go to a private school that is not located in the same LEA
you reside in, your consent must be obtained before any personally identifiable
information about your child is released between officials in the LEA where the
private school is located and officials in the LEA where you reside.
amendment of records at
parent’s request
If you believe that
information in your child’s education records collected, maintained, or used
under Part B of the IDEA is inaccurate, misleading, or violates the privacy or
other rights of the child, you may request that the education agency that
maintains the information amend the information. The participating agency
must decide whether to amend the information in accordance with your request
within a reasonable period of time of receipt of the request. If the
participating agency decides to refuse to amend the information in accordance
with the request, it must inform you of the refusal and advise you of your
right to a hearing. The participating agency shall, on request, provide
an opportunity for a hearing, which complies with FERPA procedures, to
challenge information in your child’s education records to ensure that it is
not inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise in violation of the privacy or other
rights. If, as a result of the hearing, it is determined that the
information is inaccurate, misleading, or otherwise in violation of the privacy
or other rights of the child, the participating agency must amend the
information accordingly and so inform you in writing. If, as a result of
the hearing, it is determined that the information is not inaccurate,
misleading, or otherwise in violation of the privacy or other rights, the
participating agency must inform you of the right to place in the records it
maintains on your child, a statement commenting on the information or setting
forth any reasons for disagreeing with the decision of the participating
agency. Any explanation placed in the records must be maintained by the
participating agency as part of the record as long as the record or the
contested portion is maintained by the participating agency. If the
records or the contested portion are disclosed by the participating agency to
any party, the explanation must also be disclosed to the party.
DESTRUCTION OF
INFORMATION
You must be informed by
the public agency when personally identifiable information collected,
maintained, or used under Part B of the IDEA is no longer needed to provide
education services to your child. The information must be destroyed at
your request. However, a permanent record of a student’s name, address,
and phone number, his or her grades, attendance record, classes attended, grade
level completed, and year completed may be maintained without time limitation.
Information must be destroyed in a manner that maintains
confidentiality.
CHILDREN WITH
DISABILITIES ENROLLED BY THEIR PARENTS IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS WHEN FREE APPROPRIATE
PUBLIC EDUCATION IS AT ISSUE
Part B of the IDEA does
not require an LEA to pay for the cost of education, including special
education and related services, of your child with a disability at a private
school or facility if the LEA made FAPE available to your child and you choose
to place the child in a private school or facility. However, the public
agency where the private school is located must include your child in the
population whose needs are addressed under the Part B provisions regarding
children who have been placed by their parents in a private school.
Disagreements between the parents and the public agency regarding the
availability of a program appropriate for the child, and the question of
financial reimbursement, are subject to the due process procedures. If the
parents of a child with a disability who previously received special education
and related services under the authority of an public agency enroll the child
in a private elementary or secondary school without the consent of or referral
by the public agency, a court or a hearing officer may require the agency to reimburse
the parents for the cost of that enrollment if the court or hearing officer
finds that the agency had not made a free appropriate public education
available to the child in a timely manner prior to that enrollment. The
cost of reimbursement may be reduced or denied if at the most recent IEP
meeting that the parents attended before removal of the child from the public
agency, the parents did not inform the IEP Team that they were rejecting the
placement proposed by the public agency to provide a free appropriate public
education to their child, including stating their concerns and their intent to
enroll their child in a private school at public expense; or at least 10
business days (including any holidays that occur on a business day) prior to
the removal of the child from the public agency, the parents did not give
written notice to the public agency that they were rejecting the offered
placement; or prior to the parents’ removal of the child, the public agency
informed the parents of its intent to evaluate the child (including a statement
of the purpose of the evaluation that was appropriate and reasonable), but the
parents did not make the child available for such evaluation; or a judicial
finding of unreasonableness with respect to actions taken by the parents is
found. EXCEPTION: The cost of reimbursement shall not
be reduced or denied for a parent’s failure to provide such notice if the
school prevented the parent from providing such notice, the parent had not
received this document, or compliance with this requirement would likely result
in physical harm to the child; and may in the discretion of a court or hearing
officer not be reduced or denied for failure to provide such notice if the
parent is not literate and cannot write in English; or compliance would likely
result in serious emotional harm to the child.
DISCIPLINE
Authority of School
Personnel. School personnel may consider any unique
circumstances on a case-by-case basis when determining whether a change in
placement, consistent with the other requirements of this section, is
appropriate for a child with a disability who violates a code of student
conduct.
School personnel under
this section may remove a child with a disability who violates a code of
student conduct from his or her current placement to an appropriate interim
alternative educational setting, another setting, or suspension, for not more
than 10 consecutive school days (to the extent those alternatives are applied
to children without disabilities), and for additional removals of not more than
10 consecutive school days in that same school year for separate incidents of
misconduct (as long as those removals do not constitute a change of
placement).
After a child with a
disability has been removed from his or her current placement for 10 school
days in the same school year, during any subsequent days of removal the
education agency must provide services to the child with a disability who is
removed from the child’s current placement. The child must continue to
receive educational services, so as to continue to participate in the general
education curriculum, although in another setting, and to progress toward
meeting the goals set out in the child’s IEP, and receive, as appropriate, a
functional behavioral assessment, and behavioral intervention services and
modifications, that are designed to address the behavior violation so that it
does not recur.
For disciplinary changes
in placement that would exceed 10 consecutive school days, if the behavior that
gave rise to the violation of the school code is determined not to be a
manifestation of the child’s disability, school personnel may apply the relevant
disciplinary procedures to children with disabilities in the same manner and
for the same duration as the procedures would be applied to children without
disabilities, except that the child must continue to receive educational
services. The educational services may be provided in an interim
alternative setting.
An education agency is
only required to provide services during periods of removal to a child with a
disability who has been removed from his or her current placement for 10 school
days or less in that school year, if it provides services to a child without
disabilities who is similarly removed.
After a child with a
disability has been removed from his or her current placement for 10 school
days in the same school year, if the current removal is for not more than 10
consecutive school days and is not a change of placement, school personnel, in
consultation with at least one of the child’s teachers, determine the extent to
which services are needed so as to enable the child to continue to participate
in the general education curriculum, although in another setting, and to
progress toward meeting the goals set out in the child’s IEP.
If the removal is a
change of placement, the child’s IEP Team determines appropriate
services.
Change of Placement
Because of Disciplinary Removals. The child’s
IEP Team determines the interim alternative educational setting for
services. For purposes of removals of a child with a disability from the
child’s current educational placement, a change of placement occurs if the
removal is for more than 10 consecutive school days, including partial school
days of a half day or more, or the child has been subjected to a series of
removals that constitute a pattern because the series of removals total more
than 10 school days in a school year, because the child’s behavior is
substantially similar to the child’s behavior in previous incidents of
misconduct that resulted in the series of removals, and because of such
additional factors as the length of each removal, the total amount of time the
child has been removed, and the proximity of the removals to one another. The
education agency (a minimum of an administrator and the student’s special
education teacher) determines on a case-by-case basis whether a pattern of removals
constitutes a change of placement. This determination is subject to review
through due process and judicial proceedings.
Notification. On
the date on which the decision is made to make a removal that constitutes a
change of placement of a child with a disability because of a violation of a
code of student conduct, the education agency must notify the parents of that
decision, and provide the parents with a copy of the Special Education
Rights.
Manifestation
Determination.
1. Within 10
school days of any decision to change the placement of a child with a
disability because of a violation of a code of student conduct, the education
agency, the parent, and relevant members of the child’s IEP Team (as determined
by the parent and the education agency) must review all relevant information in
the student’s file, including the child’s IEP, any teacher observations, and
any relevant information provided by the parents to determine if the conduct in
question was caused by, or had a direct and substantial relationship to, the
child’s disability, or if the conduct in question was the direct result of the
education agency’s failure to implement the IEP.
2. The
conduct must be determined to be a manifestation of the child’s disability if
the education agency, the parent, and relevant members of the child’s IEP Team
determine that either condition is met.
3. If the
education agency, the parent, and relevant members of the child’s IEP Team
determine that there was a failure to implement the IEP, the education agency
must take immediate steps to remedy those deficiencies.
Determination that
Behavior was a Manifestation. If the education agency, the
parent, and relevant members of the IEP Team make the determination that the
conduct was a manifestation of the child’s disability, the IEP Team must:
1. Conduct a
functional behavioral assessment, unless the education agency had conducted a
functional behavioral assessment during the previous 18 months before the
behavior that resulted in the change of placement occurred, and implement a
behavioral intervention plan for the child, or
2. If a
behavioral intervention plan already has been developed, review the behavioral
intervention plan, and modify it, as necessary, to address the behavior, and
3. Return the
child to the placement from which the child was removed, unless the parent and
the education agency agree to a change of placement as part of the modification
of the behavioral intervention plan.
Special Circumstances.
School personnel may remove a student to an interim alternative educational
setting for not more than 45 school days without regard to whether the behavior
is determined to be a manifestation of the child’s disability, if the child:
1. Carries a
weapon to or possesses a weapon at school, on school premises, or to or at a
school function under the jurisdiction of the Department of Education or an
education agency,
2. Knowingly
possesses or uses illegal drugs, or sells or solicits the sale of a controlled
substance, while at school, on school premises, or at a school function under
the jurisdiction of the Department of Education or an education agency, or
3. Has
inflicted serious bodily injury upon another person while at school, on school
premises, or at a school function under the jurisdiction of the Department of
Education or an education agency.
Definitions. For
purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
1. Controlled
substancemeans a drug or other substance identified under schedules I, II, III,
IV, or V in section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812(c)).
2. Illegal
drugmeans a controlled substance; but does not include a controlled substance
that is legally possessed or used under the supervision of a licensed
health-care professional or that is legally possessed or used under any other
authority under that Act or under any other provision of Federal law.
3
Serious bodily injuryhas the meaning given the term ‘‘serious bodily injury’’
under paragraph (3) of subsection (h) of section 1365 of title 18, United
States Code.
4. Weapon has
the meaning given the term ‘‘dangerous weapon’’ under paragraph (2) of the
first subsection (g) of section 930 of title 18, United States Code.
Appeal. The
parent of a child with a disability who disagrees with any decision regarding
disciplinary placement or the manifestation determination, or an LEA that
believes that maintaining the current placement of the child is substantially
likely to result in injury to the child or others, may appeal the decision by
requesting a due process hearing.
Authority of Hearing
Officer. A hearing officer hears, and makes a determination
regarding an appeal under this section. In making the determination, the
hearing officer may return the child with a disability to the placement from
which the child was removed if the hearing officer determines that the removal
was a violation of disciplinary requirements, or that the child’s behavior was
a manifestation of the child’s disability, or order a change of placement of
the child with a disability to an appropriate interim alternative educational
setting for not more than 45 school days if the hearing officer determines that
maintaining the current placement of the child is substantially likely to
result in injury to the child or to others. The procedures may be
repeated, if the education agency believes that returning the child to the
original placement is substantially likely to result in injury to the child or
to others.
Expedited Due Process
Hearing. Whenever a hearing is requested, the parents or the
education agency involved in the dispute must have an opportunity for a due
process hearing.
1. The
Department of Education is responsible for arranging the expedited due process
hearing due to disciplinary action, which must occur within 20 school days of
the date the hearing request is filed. The hearing officer must make a
determination within 10 school days after the hearing.
2. Unless the
parents and education agency agree in writing to waive the resolution meeting,
or agree to use the mediation process, a resolution meeting must occur within
seven calendar days of receiving notice of the due process hearing request, and
3. The due
process hearing may proceed unless the matter has been resolved to the
satisfaction of both parties within 15 calendar days of the receipt of the due
process hearing request.
4. The
decisions on expedited due process hearings are appealable.
Placement During Appeals. When
an appeal has been made by either the parent or the educational agency, the
child must remain in the interim alternative educational setting pending the
decision of the hearing officer or until the expiration of the time period,
whichever occurs first, unless the parent and education agency agree
otherwise.
Protections for Children
Not Determined Eligible for Special Education and Related Services. A
child who has not been determined to be eligible for special education and
related services under this part and who has engaged in behavior that violated
a code of student conduct, may assert any of the protections provided for in
this part if the education agency had knowledge, as specified below, that the child
was a child with a disability before the behavior that precipitated the
disciplinary action occurred.
A public agency must be
deemed to have knowledge that a child is a child with a disability if before
the behavior that precipitated the disciplinary action occurred if:
1. The parent
of the child expressed concern in writing to supervisory or administrative
personnel of the appropriate educational agency, or a teacher of the child,
that the child is in need of special education and related services,
2. The parent
of the child requested an evaluation of the child, or
3. The
teacher of the child, or other personnel of the education agency, expressed
specific concerns about a pattern of behavior demonstrated by the child
directly to the director of special education of the agency or to other
supervisory personnel of the agency.
Exception. A
public agency would not be deemed to have knowledge if the parent of the child
has not allowed an evaluation of the child, or has refused services under this part,
or the child has been evaluated and determined to not be a child with a
disability under this part.
Conditions that Apply if
No Basis of Knowledge.
1. If a
public agency does not have knowledge that a child is a child with a disability
prior to taking disciplinary measures against the child, the child may be
subjected to the disciplinary measures applied to children without disabilities
who engage in comparable behaviors.
2. If a
request is made for an evaluation of a child during the time period in which
the child is subjected to disciplinary measures, the evaluation must be
conducted in an expedited manner. Until the evaluation is completed, the
child remains in the educational placement determined by school authorities,
which can include suspension or expulsion without educational services.
3. If the
child is determined to be a child with a disability, taking into consideration
information from the evaluation conducted by the education agency and
information provided by the parents, the education agency must provide special
education and related services in accordance with this part.
Referral to and Action by
Law Enforcement and Judicial Authorities. Nothing in
this part prohibits an agency from reporting an alleged crime committed by a
child with a disability to appropriate authorities or prevents State law
enforcement and judicial authorities from exercising their responsibilities
with regard to the application of Federal and State law to crimes committed by
a child with a disability.
Whenever law enforcement
or judicial authorities are contacted by a public agency personnel reporting an
alleged crime committed by a child with a disability, the IEP Team must, within
two weeks of the child’s return to school setting:
1. If a
public agency does not have knowledge that a child is a child with a disability
prior to taking disciplinary measures against the child, the child may be
subjected to the disciplinary measures applied to children without disabilities
who engage in comparable behaviors. Conduct a functional behavioral
assessment unless the LEA has conducted a functional behavioral assessment
during the previous 18 months before the behavior that resulted in the change
of placement occurred, and implement a behavioral intervention plan for the
child, or
2. If the
behavioral intervention plan already has been developed, review the behavioral
intervention and modify it, as necessary, to address the behavior.
Transmittal of Records. (1)
An agency reporting an alleged crime committed by a child with a disability
must ensure that copies of the special education and disciplinary records of
the child are transmitted for consideration by the appropriate authorities to
whom the agency reports the crime. (2) An agency reporting an alleged
crime under this section may transmit copies of the child’s special education
and disciplinary records only to the extent that the transmission is permitted
by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.